World Press Network

www.WorldPressNetwork.net
It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:00 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 7:09 pm 

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 3:34 am
Posts: 1148
The Palestine Solidarity Campaign has issued this important statement regarding the BBC.

BBC Censors ‘ Palestine ’
BBC Radio 1xtra has removed the word ‘ Palestine ’ when playing a song by artist, Mic Righteous. In an extraordinary act of censorship, the word was filtered out of a recording as Mic Righteous sang the words ‘Free Palestine’, part of his song ‘Fire in the Booth’.
The censorship took place on the BBC show, Hip Hop M1X with Charlie Sloth, and the BBC has since issued a statement saying: ‘All BBC programmes have a responsibility to be impartial when dealing with controversial subjects…and an edit was made in this instance to ensure that impartiality was not compromised.’
Listen to the recording, with edit, here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00f15g4
There are several questions to be asked here of the BBC:
Is the word ‘ Palestine ’ controversial only when used in songs, or will the BBC be deleting it from all its programming?
Is the word ‘ Israel ’ similarly controversial?
How does the BBC decide what is a controversial subject? Which other news subjects does it deem to be controversial and worthy of BBC edits?
As a news organisation, how can the BBC report on news when it feels it has to censor ‘controversial subjects’ in order to maintain impartiality? All political news, by its nature, is controversial and excites a range of viewpoints – there is no consensus on anything political. Why is the BBC making this decision only over Palestine ? This in itself reveals the partiality of the BBC.
Is the BBC aware that Palestine is a geographical area and therefore can’t be controversial? If Palestinian leaders declare a sovereign Palestinian state in September, how will the BBC report on this if it considers the word ‘ Palestine ’ too controversial to be mentioned?
Is the BBC aware that the word ‘ Palestine ’ is recognised and used freely by MPs, and even by the Prime Minister, David Cameron?
When the band, The Special A.K.A, released its song ‘Free Nelson Mandela’ in 1984, why were the words ‘Nelson Mandela’ not censored by BBC radio? Apartheid in South Africa was a controversial subject, and Mandela was still considered a terrorist by the UK and US governments.
While the BBC may have appeared to make itself look utterly ridiculous with this edit, the action itself reveals its ingrained bias against Palestine and is a serious matter.
It follows the BBC’s refusal to screen the DEC Appeal during Israel’s air, land and sea assault on a besieged Gaza in 2008/9, and its screening of the one-sided Panorama programme Death in the Med last August, which even the BBC’s own complaints panel found breached its guidelines on accuracy and impartiality in several instances.
You can take the following actions:
Write to the BBC via the complaints form on its website, and ask for a reply: https://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/forms/
Leave a message on the BBC’s message board under the Charlie Sloth programme: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00f15g4
Write a letter for publication to the Radio Times: radio.times@bbc.co.uk By post: Radio Times, Media Centre, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TQ
Get as much publicity for this song as possible – ask your local radio station, community radio station, hospital radio, student campus radio etc to play it
Write to the BBC and demand it plays the song without an edit: radio1.enquiries@bbc.co.uk Write also to your local BBC radio station.


I have another question: How will/would the BBC treat the Desmond Dekker former No. 1 single “Israelites” ? If they applied the same political censorship, there would be nothing left.

I tried to comment on the “song” (the tune is hard to whistle) but the BBC website was mysteriously “undergoing maintenance” and cannot be accessed.

This is a blatant case of pro-Israel bias in the BBC, always apparent, often covert, but in this case, astonishingly all too stark. The licence-payers should be aware of how their money is being spent.
At least as pertinent, is the fact that the BBC should realise its licence payers are adults, well able to make their own judgements on political partiality, and don’t need the BBC to do it for them. This one has fired my belly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 7:17 am 

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:45 pm
Posts: 4247
Shocking .. a new LOW for the BBC, which is now appearing to be openly pro-zionist.

The "law" (which is already biased in favor of the rich/powerful .. similar to super-injunctions protecting the rich/powerful) is yet again used very selectively. The concept of impartiality is nice in theory, but in practice, does it mean that every mention of Palestine must be followed by Israel ? Zionists would say YES .. but then the zionists would refuse to countenance the reverse. This isn't "freedom", but Orwellian dictatorship.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 9:34 am 

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 3:34 am
Posts: 1148
Well said, Mr. Editor. In this particular case, taking the words right out of an artiste's mouth, is despicable, but the BBC gets away with stuff like this, as it has no incentive to do otherwise, and can be totally blase about its income. If you don't pay the licence, you go to jail. At least with crass advertising, the people who pay huge amounts for a few seconds' sales efforts, can be contacted and shown how their money is being used. With the BBC, you keep paying, take what you're given and either shut up or talk to a brick wall. But you have to try.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 4:05 pm 

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:45 pm
Posts: 4247
Quote:
When is censorship a way of ensuring impartiality? What will the BBC now do, when the song "Israelites" (Desmond Dekker former No.1) is broadcast. Bet it won't be censored or edited. Will an "edit" be made every time the word Palestine, or the phrase "free Palestine" is used, and how will that be balanced by references to Israel. Perhaps we could ask the Co-Producer of Death in the Med, but as his name is Mr. Israel Goldvich, but of course, with this new policy, this gentleman's first name might have to be "edited". If you can't say Palestine, surely you can't say Israel, either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 5:01 pm 

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:45 pm
Posts: 4247
Picked up by http://whatreallyhappened.com/node/115364 with comment :
Quote:
Israel treats the whole world like it is Palestine!


Thanks Mike.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 7:00 pm 

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:45 pm
Posts: 4247
This thread seems to have struck a nerve on the web and has been widely picked up, as seen on :
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=BIAS%3 ... C+censors+"Palestine"+from+rap+song

One of the articles has the actual broadcast and video :
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/4847 ... m-rap-song
Quote:
See the censorship at the 3 minute 01 second point

I worked for the BBC for years in news and sport and 'impartial' is the last thing it is. The BBC is a deeply controlled organisation that get's its income via the State and can anyone imagine that 'Free Israel' would have been censored in the same way?

Not a chance.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2011 6:10 am 

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:45 pm
Posts: 4247
http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2011/05/ ... -to-exist/
Quote:
In further case of censorship, the BBC deny Palestine’s right to exist

In further case of censorship, the BBC deny Palestine’s right to existIt seems that the Mic Righteous controversy, in which the BBC censored the words ‘Free Palestine’ from his freestyle on 1Xtra radio, has opened a can of worms the BBC cannot ignore for much longer. Just one day after they released an official response to the hundreds of complaints over the drowning out of the term ‘Free Palestine’, a further case of censorship has emerged. On the very same radio segment, ‘Fire in the Booth’ with DJ Charlie Sloth, just a couple of months after the Mic Righteous freestyle, rapper Bigz made a guest appearance. Over a commercial hip-hop beat, he rhymes:

“Come on Joe, who you know as hard as this? Bringing more fire than the -”

And then silence. The term he used at the end of the line, ‘Gaza Strip’, has been censored out. Not a political statement, not a humanitarian statement, but the name of a geographical piece of land. A simple description of a place that does exist. The BBC’s seeming submission to the Zionist lobby has taken precedence over common sense. The BBC seem intent on completely eradicating any recognition of Palestine’s right to exist from their radio broadcasts, but their actions have had the opposite effect.

In a strong show of solidarity with the Palestinian cause, the BBC 1Xtra Facebook and Twitter have been flooded with page upon page of comments protesting against the blatant censorship. Every single time the radio station make any ‘status update’ online now, even if it’s content is completely unrelated, the floodgates are opened. ‘Free Palestine!’ ‘Don’t Censor Palestine!’ Some comments are demanding the BBC re-broadcast the Mic Righteous freestyle, this time un-edited. Many are demanding to hear Lowkey’s popular single ‘Long Live Palestine’ on radio; despite once reaching number one in the iTunes hip-hop chart, the song was consistently ignored by BBC radio.

In response to the outcry over the Mic Righteous censorship, the BBC have said “All BBC programmes have a responsibility to be impartial when dealing with controversial subjects and an edit was made to the artist’s freestyle to ensure that impartiality was maintained.” Not only does the brevity of the statement seem slightly insulting, considering a lengthy response to complaints that an episode of ‘Family Guy’ was aired slightly later than usual, but also, in the case of the Bigz censorship, the explanation holds no water.

On the very same show, DJ Charlie Sloth played a Bigz track entitled ‘I Just Want The Paper’. In the song he raps:

“Chilling on a beach… Tel Aviv”

Guess what, the words ‘Tel Aviv’ are not censored out. If you were to propagate the ridiculous argument that you are censoring out the words ‘Gaza Strip’ in the name of impartiality, then why would the words ‘Tel Aviv’ not recieve the same treatment. However, to target Charlie Sloth, the host of the show, would be to completely miss the point. Ironically, most BBC hip-hop DJ’s will never face the wrath of the political censors, because they have already fallen into line. Charlie Sloth is paying a service to hip-hop music, and to hip-hop culture, by stretching the boundaries of ‘acceptable dissent’.

Censoring out political messages or even, it seems, geographical locations, does not lie with a radio DJ, it goes right to the top. Mark Thompson, Director-General of the BBC, has a lot to answer for.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:38 pm 

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 3:34 am
Posts: 1148
What about "blanket" NON-coverage? Israel has been experiencing social unrest, protests and demonstrations for nearly three weeks. There are "tent cities" in some of the major thoroughfares in Tel Aviv, and last weekend, the "gathering" was an estimated 300,000. When it was Cairo - top-story news on BBC TV and radio, then the "Arab Spring". Headlines, special programmes, news bulletins, interviews with parties from all sides.
Israel....? Nothing. Zilch. The flagship Today programme has been monitored daily, and not a single word has been uttered. One could wonder if there was some kind of bias or favour here.......


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:46 pm 

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 3:34 am
Posts: 1148
PSC response to BBC whitewash regarding censorship complaints:

BBC’s rejection of complaints over ‘Free Palestine ’ censorship condemned by rights groups

The BBC’s reasons for dismissing complaints about its censorship of the word ‘ Palestine ’ from a freestyle music performance have been described as ‘absurd’ by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
In a letter to complainants sent at the end of August, Francesca O’Brien, the BBC’s head of editorial standards, said appeals against the decision would not be considered.
The BBC had censored the word ‘ Palestine ’ from the lyrics ‘I can scream Free Palestine’ in a freestyle performance by the artist Mic Righteous, broadcast on the Charlie Sloth Hip Hop M1X on Radio 1Xtra in April.
Justifying the decision, Ms O’Brien said ‘the subject of freedom for Palestine …was a contentious issue’.
Amena Saleem, of Palestine Solidarity Campaign, said: ‘Why does the BBC feel it is controversial to call for occupied territories to be freed from occupation?
‘Calling for freedom from occupation for the Palestinian people shouldn’t be seen as controversial unless the BBC disagrees with international law and with the inalienable right of all human beings to liberty.’
In an earlier letter to complainants, Paul Smith, head of editorial standards (BBC audio and music), wrote: ‘Referencing Palestine is fine, but implying that it is not free is the contentious issue.’
Ms Saleem added: ‘Instead of simply accepting it made a mistake and apologising, the BBC has tied itself in knots attempting to defend the indefensible. By saying it is contentious to imply that Palestine is not free, it has wandered into the realms of the absurd.’
Complainants have now written to the BBC Trust asking it to reconsider its decision to reject their complaints that the censorship displays bias against Palestine .
The BBC has responded to the controversy by saying it will play the freestyle in full, alongside an interview with Mic Righteous, but has not given a date or named a show for the broadcast.

Notes to Editors

The Mic Righteous recording, with the edit coming after three minutes, can be viewed here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00f15g4
In May, 19 artists, MPs, lawyers and academics wrote to the Guardian to protest against the edit as ‘an attack on the principles of free speech’. The letter can be viewed here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ma ... NTCMP=SRCH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:16 pm 

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 3:34 am
Posts: 1148
The BBC is at least consistent in its bias towards Israel. Its radio flagship, Today, on Monday Sep12 2011, included an item about the Turkish Prime Minister visiting Egypt. So who did the BBC find to comment on it? A Turk/expert on Turkey....no. An Egyptian/expert on Egypt...no. A BBC specialist on the Middle East...no. An independent media expert on the Middle East...no. The interviewee they chose to comment on a Turkish visit to Egypt, was the ISRAEL specialist of Chatham House. 'Nuff said.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group